People v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The purpose of Rule 412(a)(ii) is to protect a defendant from surprise and inadequate preparation at trial by allowing defense counsel to investigate the circumstances surrounding any statements.”
• “The purpose of Rule 412(a)(ii) is to protect a defendant from surprise and inadequate preparation at trial by allowing defense counsel to investigate the circumstances surrounding any statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Davis
  California Supreme Court· 1998-11-05· cited 129×
• People v. Lattimore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-02· cited 46×
• People v. Durdin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-02-22· cited 22×
• People v. Ramos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-08· cited 16×
• People v. Winford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-02· cited 8×
• People v. Okoro
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-03-31· cited 7×
• People v. Pergeson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-04-22· cited 6×
• People v. Daniel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-24· cited 5×
• People v. Jenkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-21· cited 3×
• People v. Jenkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-02-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Enoch
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 3,273×
• People v. Daniels
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-27· cited 32×
• People v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-12-03· cited 30×
• People v. T.D.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-06-02· cited 22×
• People v. Borst
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-11-24· cited 9×
• People v. Vaughn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-09-06· cited 8×