People v. Ramos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the adequacy of the amount of the 18 damages is generally a matter for the jury to decide\
• Statute did not require prosecution to prove that defendant did not have a license to carry a weapon in any county in the State, only that he did not have a license in the county where he resided
• Statute did not require prosecution to prove that defendant did not have a license to carry a weapon in any county in the State, only that he did not have a license in the county where he resided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lakomy
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-02-01· cited 34×
• People v. O'BRIEN
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-17· cited 31×
• State v. Roadenbaugh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-12-02· cited 19×
• People v. Baker
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-10-02· cited 10×
• Salamone v. Douglas Marine Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2024-08-08· cited 10×
• People v. Toler
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-02-22· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Bryant
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 9×
• People v. Clark
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-06-22· cited 5×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• People v. Braswell
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-08-26· cited 5×