People v. P.W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the totality of the evidence in reviewing a neglect finding
• “[ejvidence is relevant if it tends to prove a fact in controversy or render a matter in issue more or less probable”
• “Evidence is relevant if it tends to prove a fact in controversy or render a matter in issue more or less probable”
• the manifest weight of the evidence is the appropriate standard in reviewing the circuit court’s determination of neglect based upon an injurious environment
• “Evidence is relevant if it tends to prove a fact in controversy or render a matter in issue more or less probable.”
• \[a]ll evidence must be relevant to be admissible\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).