United States v. Guy Jerome Ursery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that a district court has “discretion to deny a section 3582(c)(2) motion, even if the retroactive amendment has lowered the guideline range.”
• stating that “a district court has the discretion to deny a section 3582(c)(2) motion, even if the retroactive amendment has lowered the guideline range”
• suggesting an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is the appropriate vehicle to pursue retroactive application of an amendment to the Guidelines
• “[A] district court has the discretion to deny a section 3582(c)(2) motion, even if the retroactive amendment has lowered the guideline range.”
• “Unless exceptional circumstances are present, we will not address an issue not first raised in district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).