Skip to main content

People v. Phillips

Citations

  • 580 N.E.2d 168
  • 219 Ill. App. 3d 877
  • 162 Ill. Dec. 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • second district of the appellate court held that supreme court’s interpretation of a criminal statute, announced during the pendency of the defendant’s appeal, applied to the defendant even though the second district had previously adhered to the contrary interpretation
  • second district of the appellate court held that supreme court's interpretation of a criminal statute, announced during the pendency of the defendant's appeal, applied to the defendant even though the second district had previously adhered to the contrary interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unverzagt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.