Skip to main content
· 2/5/1980

Rome v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

Citations

  • 401 N.E.2d 1032
  • 81 Ill. App. 3d 776
  • 36 Ill. Dec. 894
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the court would consider an argument raised in the brief of appellee and in the reply brief of appellant
  • points raised for the first time in an appellant’s reply brief are not forfeited where those contentions serve to rebut arguments advanced by the appellee in his brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.