· 2/5/1980
Rome v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
Citations
- 401 N.E.2d 1032
- 81 Ill. App. 3d 776
- 36 Ill. Dec. 894
- 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the court would consider an argument raised in the brief of appellee and in the reply brief of appellant
- points raised for the first time in an appellant’s reply brief are not forfeited where those contentions serve to rebut arguments advanced by the appellee in his brief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.