Skip to main content

People v. Phillips

Citations

  • 555 N.W.2d 742
  • 219 Mich. App. 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a pretrial detainee also lacks Fourth Amendment privacy protection because the institutional objectives remain the same
  • reasoning in Hudson “applies in the context of pretrial detention in jail”
  • rationale underlying Hudson “applies equally to pretrial detainees and inmates confined in jails”
  • rationale underlying Hudson “applies equally to pretrial detainees and inmates confined in jails”
  • extending Hudson “to pretrial detainees and inmates confined in jails”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, McDonald, Talbot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.