People v. Pesquera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly allowed the child victims of sexual assault — ranging in age from four to six — to give videotaped depositions in lieu of live testimony under MCL 600.2163a
• “The limiting instruction given to the jury also served to limit the danger of unfair prejudice by restricting use of the evidence.”
• “The limiting instruction given to the jury also served to limit the danger of unfair prejudice by restricting use of the evidence.”
• “The limiting instruction given to the jury also served to limit the danger of unfair prejudice by restricting use of the evidence.”
• “The limiting instruction given to the jury also served to limit the danger of unfair prejudice by restricting use of the evidence.”
• “The limiting instruction given to the jury also served to limit the danger of unfair prejudice by restricting use of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Pesquera

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Pesquera
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2005-12-31