California Supreme Court· 7/9/1992

People v. Perez

Citations

831 P.2d 1159
2 Cal. 4th 1117
9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 577
92 Daily Journal DAR 9631
92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6115
1992 Cal. LEXIS 3051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

indicating that the defendant’s conduct after the killing constituted facts that a jury could reasonably consider in relation to the manner of killing
In reviewing sufficiency of the evidence, “[i]t is elementary . . . that the prosecutor’s argument is not evidence and the theories suggested are not the exclusive theories that may be considered by the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panelli, Mosk, Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.