Skip to main content

People v. Pelo

Citations

  • 894 N.E.2d 415
  • 384 Ill. App. 3d 776
  • 37 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2009
  • 323 Ill. Dec. 648
  • 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 825
  • 2008 WL 3854978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that media outlets were authorized to file an interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1) challenging an order denying access to an evidence deposition
  • holding that media outlets were authorized to file an interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1) challenging an order denying access to an evidence deposition
  • balancing rights in a case against “an accused stalker who allegedly committed sexual assault against several different victims”
  • balancing rights in a case against “an accused stalker who allegedly 40 No. 1-08-1728 committed sexual assault against several different victims”
  • presumption of access did not apply to evidence deposition that had not yet been entered into evidence in a criminal case
  • presumption of access did not apply to pretrial deposition that had not yet been entered into evidence in the criminal trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.