Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/2/2007

People v. Peden

Citations

878 N.E.2d 1180
377 Ill. App. 3d 463
316 Ill. Dec. 156
2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 1153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial court’s “excessive and repetitive admonishments regarding issues of defense strategy and defendant’s right to testify” were improper
stating that despite the risks, “a trial court has 17 discretion to admonish a defendant of his right against self-incrimination”
stating that despite the risks, “a trial court has discretion to admonish a defendant of his right against self-incrimination”
stating that despite the risks, “a trial court has 17 discretion to admonish a defendant of his right against self-incrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Peden

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.