People v. Peden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court’s “excessive and repetitive admonishments regarding issues of defense strategy and defendant’s right to testify” were improper
• stating that despite the risks, “a trial court has 17 discretion to admonish a defendant of his right against self-incrimination”
• stating that despite the risks, “a trial court has discretion to admonish a defendant of his right against self-incrimination”
• stating that despite the risks, “a trial court has 17 discretion to admonish a defendant of his right against self-incrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).