Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/22/2007

People v. Pryor

Citations

865 N.E.2d 279
372 Ill. App. 3d 422
309 Ill. Dec. 916
2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding the defendant could not complain about the trial court’s response to the jury’s question where the defendant acquiesced by failing to object to the proposed response
stating the “purpose of the vehicular hijacking statute has more to do with the injury to the victim than the taking of property”
where the evidence produces “conflicting inferences” is the trier of fact’s responsibility to resolve that conflict
\It is well settled that a claim that multiple convictions were improper can be waived by failing to raise the issue before the trial court.\
where the evidence produces “conflicting inferences” is the trier of fact’s responsibility to resolve that conflict
“It is well settled that a claim that multiple convictions were improper can be waived by failing to raise the issue before the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neville

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.