People v. Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State to peremptorily challenge a sworn juror in light of new information
• because the trial court gave both parties the opportunity to peremptorily challenge a sworn juror, the State did not receive an “ ‘unfair advantage’ ”
• the juror stated her stepson had been arrested for the same offense and she was unfamiliar with the details but it was later learned the stepson’s involvement was more extensive than the juror indicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).