People v. Page

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant has no right, whether federal or state, to combine representation pro se and by counsel, citing Guthrie
• stating that a defendant has no right, whether federal or state, to combine representation pro se and by counsel, citing Guthrie

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gerill Corp. v. Jack L. Hargrove Builders, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 134×
• People v. Lighthall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-10-21· cited 30×
• People v. Mazar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-06· cited 28×
• People v. Mazar (Nunc Pro Tunc June 28, 2002)
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bounds v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
• First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-03-29· cited 1,536×
• People v. Guthrie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-12· cited 23×
• Swager v. Couri
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-23· cited 16×