People v. Mazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the balance of the issues at trial were relatively simple” even with the admission of fingerprint, footprint, and glass identification testimony
• remand necessary where defendant “appeals from the circuit court’s sentencing order on his convictions”
• heelless shoes issued by jail were not readily identifiable as prison garb
• remanding for compliance with Rule 605(a)
• remanding for compliance with Rule 605(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).