Michigan Supreme Court· 9/19/1983
People v. Oliver
Citations
- 338 N.W.2d 167
- 417 Mich. 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he exigent circumstances doctrine is applicable only within the narrow range of circumstances that present a real danger to the police or the public or a real danger that evidence or a suspect might be lost.”
- “[T]he exigent circumstances doctrine is applicable only within the narrow range of circumstances that present a real danger to the police or the public or a real danger that evidence or a suspect might be lost.”
- to establish probable cause based upon information supplied by an informant, there must be sufficient facts to permit an independent determination that the person supplying the information is reliable and that the information is based on something more substantial than casual rumor
- arrest warrant requirements apply in motel context
- arrest warrant requirements apply in motel context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brickley, Kavanagh, Levin, Cavanagh, Williams, Ryan, Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-12-18· cited 481×
- People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-07-28· cited 392×
- People v. CiprianoMichigan Supreme Court· 1988-09-16· cited 209×
- State v. MollicaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-03-16· cited 144×
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 90×
- People v. GallowayMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-02-19· cited 67×
- People v. NguyenMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-06-24· cited 58×
- Tope v. HoweMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-08-07· cited 35×
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-08-10· cited 35×
- People v. BlasiusMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 29×
- People v. Melvin DavisMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-10-21· cited 26×
- People v. HentkowskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 22×
- People v. HouzeMichigan Supreme Court· 1986-05-20· cited 19×
- People v. ROBERT HILLMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-11-19· cited 16×
- State v. Gary Lunsford (075691)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-08-01· cited 16×
- People v. MitchellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-07-27· cited 14×
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1988-11-18· cited 13×
- People v. CumbusMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-05-21· cited 10×
- People v. CourtsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-05-16· cited 9×
- People v. CookMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-04-10· cited 8×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,263×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 1,585×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1951-11-26· cited 1,320×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.