People v. Ogunsola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fundamental fairness requires that a jury be instructed on all of the elements it must find beyond a reasonable doubt
• holding that fundamental fairness requires that a jury be instructed on all of the elements it must find beyond a reasonable doubt
• holding that it was plain error not to instruct the jury that the State must prove the defendant intended to defraud the - 19 - victim, as “[t]he principal contested issue relevant to defendant’s culpability was whether he had the intent to defraud”
• finding grave error in a jury instruction for a deceptive practice charge that did not state the defendant must have had “the intent to defraud”
• finding grave error in a jury instruction for a deceptive practice charge that did not state the defendant must have had “the intent to defraud”
• finding plain error where jury instructions omitted the intent element of deceptive practices, and “[t]he principal contested issue relevant to defendant’s culpability was whether he had the intent to defraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).