Illinois Supreme Court· 12/4/1981
People v. Ogunsola
Citations
- 429 N.E.2d 861
- 87 Ill. 2d 216
- 57 Ill. Dec. 744
- 1981 Ill. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that fundamental fairness requires that a jury be instructed on all of the elements it must find beyond a reasonable doubt
- holding that fundamental fairness requires that a jury be instructed on all of the elements it must find beyond a reasonable doubt
- holding that it was plain error not to instruct the jury that the State must prove the defendant intended to defraud the - 19 - victim, as “[t]he principal contested issue relevant to defendant’s culpability was whether he had the intent to defraud”
- finding grave error in a jury instruction for a deceptive practice charge that did not state the defendant must have had “the intent to defraud”
- finding grave error in a jury instruction for a deceptive practice charge that did not state the defendant must have had “the intent to defraud”
- finding plain error where jury instructions omitted the intent element of deceptive practices, and “[t]he principal contested issue relevant to defendant’s culpability was whether he had the intent to defraud”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-10-01· cited 295×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 235×
- People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 210×
- People v. HoppIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-02-20· cited 198×
- People v. HucksteadIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 144×
- People v. CortesIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 137×
- People v. FiererIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 105×
- People v. HariIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 96×
- People v. PegramIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 77×
- People v. BurtonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-08-16· cited 51×
- Mitchell Buick & Oldsmobile Sales, Inc. v. National Dealer Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-20· cited 47×
- People v. LowryAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-03· cited 43×
- People v. BostonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-30· cited 41×
- People v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-06-20· cited 35×
- People v. GriffinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-13· cited 34×
- People v. LandAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-24· cited 32×
- People v. HouserAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-05-28· cited 31×
- People v. VelascoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-08· cited 30×
- People v. RadfordIllinois Supreme Court· 2020-06-18· cited 30×
- People v. GetterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-03-17· cited 29×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-02-20· cited 258×
- People v. JoynerIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-01-28· cited 150×
- People v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 143×
- People v. TannenbaumIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 123×
- People v. UnderwoodIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 122×
- People v. ParksIllinois Supreme Court· 1976-11-15· cited 97×
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-09-13· cited 58×
- People v. CookIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 46×
- People v. BillingsleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-02-01· cited 43×
- People v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-02-28· cited 42×
- Pratt v. Kilborn Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-05-23· cited 17×
- People v. OgunsolaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-03· cited 7×
Other cases named People v. Ogunsola
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.