Skip to main content
· 2/20/2004

People v. Hopp

Citations

  • 805 N.E.2d 1190
  • 209 Ill. 2d 1
  • 282 Ill. Dec. 173
  • 2004 Ill. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the alleged instructional error involved “the essential disputed issue” at trial
  • stating “substantial defects are not waived by failure to make timely objections [to a jury instruction] if the interest of justice require”
  • the plain-error rule requires the defendant to “show that the error caused a severe threat to the fairness” of the trial (emphasis in original)
  • the plain error rule requires the defendant to “show that the error caused a severe threat to the fairness of [the] trial” (emphasis in original)
  • the plain-error rule requires the defendant to ‘show that the error caused a severe threat to the fairness’ of the trial (emphasis in original)
  • under the doctrine of plain error, the defendant bears the burden of showing a severe threat to the fairness of the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.