People v. Nolan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The purpose of the rule of completeness is to correctly convey the true meaning of a statement to the triers of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sims
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-30· cited 37×
• People v. Romero
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-10-29· cited 26×
• People v. Craigen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-11-18· cited 25×
• People v. Abdullah
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-03-13· cited 20×
• People v. Marsh
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-03-29· cited 9×
• People v. Hernandez-Chirinos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-03-13· cited 8×
• People v. Henry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-01-11· cited 6×
• People v. Romero
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-01-14· cited 5×
• People v. Abdullah Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing on 3/13/03
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-12-02