People v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State is to be given latitude to determine which aspects of its case to accentuate in closing argument and finding no error in the State’s discussion of the elements of the offense where the court properly instructed the jury
• holding that the State is to be given latitude to determine which aspects of its case to accentuate in closing argument and finding no error in the State’s discussion of the elements of the offense where the court properly instructed the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-06-30· cited 53×
• People v. Howell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-06-14· cited 51×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Enoch
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 3,273×
• People v. Landwer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-05-18· cited 95×
• People v. Rivera
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-01-29· cited 55×
• People v. Gillespie
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 54×
• People v. DePaolo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-11-17· cited 19×
• People v. Walensky
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-12-31· cited 17×
• People v. Nolan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-08-14· cited 15×