Skip to main content

People v. Nitz

Citations

  • 820 N.E.2d 536
  • 353 Ill. App. 3d 978
  • 289 Ill. Dec. 760
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that a majority of the United States Supreme Court now prescribe to the Neder dissent
  • “we firmly believe that a majority of the justices on today’s United States Supreme Court would never allow the harmless error analysis that we are about to engage in”
  • Awe firmly believe that a majority of the justices on today=s United States Supreme Court would never allow the harmless error analysis that we are about to engage in@
  • unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23
  • unpublished text under Supreme Court Rule 23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kuehn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.