People v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that appellate courts should not consider issues not yet addressed by the trial court because to do so would mean rendering an advisory opinion
• explaining that appellate courts should not consider issues not yet addressed by the trial court because to do so would mean rendering an advisory opinion
• explaining that appellate courts should not consider issues not yet addressed by the trial court because to do so would mean rendering an advisory opinion
• explaining that appellate courts should not consider issues not yet addressed by the trial court because to do so would mean rendering an advisory opinion
• “ ‘ “An appeal *** shall lie *** from a decision or order *** suppressing or excluding evidence *** in a criminal proceeding, not made after the defendant has been put in jeopardy ***.” ’ ” (Emphasis in original.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-07-15· cited 12×
• In re T.P.S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-20· cited 8×
• In Re TPS
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-20· cited 2×
• People v. Mendiola
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Young
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 161×
• Madison Park Bank v. Zagel
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 97×
• People v. Flatt
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 89×
• People v. Drum
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 85×
• Yaccino v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-02-05· cited 10×
• People v. Dorsey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-11-26· cited 6×