Michigan Court of Appeals· 2/5/1970
People v. Morrow
Citations
- 175 N.W.2d 523
- 21 Mich. App. 603
- 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the Court relied on Johnson to reject the inference that the defendant’s unexplained presence at the scene sufficed to sustain a conviction for larceny
- the Court relied on Johnson to reject the inference that the defendant's unexplained presence at the scene sufficed to sustain a conviction for larceny
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lesinski, Gillis, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-10-09· cited 920×
- People v. DavenportMichigan Court of Appeals· 1972-03-22· cited 84×
- People v. PalmerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1972-08-29· cited 26×
- People v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court· 1972-05-04· cited 14×
- People v. WingfieldMichigan Court of Appeals· 1975-06-11· cited 13×
- People v. ValotMichigan Court of Appeals· 1971-04-26· cited 11×
- People v. Dale WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1970-10-27· cited 3×
- People v. MitchellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1971-03-29· cited 2×
- People v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-05-27· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court· 1968-12-27· cited 37×
- People v. LamboMichigan Court of Appeals· 1967-11-27· cited 31×
- People v. GadsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1957-05-17· cited 25×
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1966-09-13· cited 21×
- People v. CurleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1894-03-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.