Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/1/1999

People v. Morrow

Citations

708 N.E.2d 430
303 Ill. App. 3d 671
236 Ill. Dec. 844
1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a previous inconsistent statement, where at trial a witness recanted both her pretrial statement and grand jury testimony, was alone sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
“Assuming arguendo that there was no corroborative evidence, it does not necessarily portend that, as a matter of law, a recanted prior inconsistent statement admitted under section 115-10.1 cannot support a conviction.”
“Although the defendant’s credibility was an issue in this case, specific instances of untruthfulness are not admissible to attack a witness’s believability”
“Although the defendant’s credibility was an issue in this case, specific instances of untruthfulness are not admissible to attack a witness’s believability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Morrow

59 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.