People v. Morfin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding Miller is retroactive because it created a new substantive rule, reinforced by Supreme Court’s application of Miller to Jackson
• “[W]e find that Miller constitutes a new substantive rule.”
• “[W]e find that Miller constitutes a new substantive rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).