Supreme Court of Colorado· 6/11/2007
People v. Moreno
Citations
- 160 P.3d 242
- 2007 WL 1662641
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the clear consensus in non-murder cases is that the doctrine requires a showing of an intent on the part of the defendant to prevent the declarant from testifying at trial”
- noting that “the clear consensus in non-murder cases is that the doctrine requires a showing of an intent on the part of the defendant to prevent the declarant from testifying at trial”
- collecting cases and noting that “the clear consensus in non-murder cases is that the doctrine requires a showing of an intent on the part of the defendant to prevent the declarant from testifying at trial.”
- “To find the forfeiture of a protection so integral to the truth-seeking process, quite apart from any design or attempt by the defendant to subvert that process, would * * * divorce the forfeiture by wrongdoing doctrine from its very reason for existing * * *.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Eid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-10-25· cited 855×
- Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-09-10· cited 120×
- Gerald P. VanPatten v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-05-02· cited 58×
- State v. Raul SanchezMontana Supreme Court· 2008-01-31· cited 48×
- Vasquez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-11-13· cited 35×
- People v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-04-24· cited 30×
- State v. Moua HerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-29· cited 26×
- State v. PooleUtah Supreme Court· 2010-04-30· cited 15×
- Ponce v. FelkerNinth Circuit· 2010-05-24· cited 12×
- Raul Sanchez v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2012-09-04· cited 12×
- State v. HerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-05-06· cited 8×
- Schmidt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2017-09-07· cited 8×
- Pena v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2008-01-14· cited 5×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
- Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1900-05-28· cited 321×
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-21· cited 238×
- People v. StechlyIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 217×
- People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-10-17· cited 152×
- State v. MechlingWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2006-06-30· cited 141×
- People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-01-23· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-07-01· cited 88×
- People v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-12-04· cited 81×
- State v. IvyTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 74×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 56×
- People v. GilesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 56×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-01-25· cited 44×
- People v. Sheena K.California Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.