Colorado Court of Appeals· 3/28/1991
People v. Mogul
Citations
- 812 P.2d 705
- 15 Brief Times Rptr. 363
- 1991 Colo. App. LEXIS 92
- 1991 WL 42089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A defendant's technical legal knowledge is not a factor to be considered by the trial court in deciding whether to grant or deny the motion.\
- The right of self-representation “may not be used to impede the efficient administration of justice.”
- “A defendant’s technical legal knowledge is not a factor to be considered by the trial court in deciding whether to grant or deny the motion [to proceed pro se].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Ney, Plank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
- People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-11-10· cited 629×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-05-17· cited 56×
- People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-22· cited 37×
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-05-22· cited 29×
- People v. ShepardColorado Court of Appeals· 1999-03-04· cited 23×
- People v. BoltonColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-07-01· cited 22×
- People v. AbduColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-05-14· cited 22×
- People v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-06-29· cited 21×
- People v. VialpandoColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-08-07· cited 19×
- Thomas v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2000-11-03· cited 14×
- People v. WallerColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-08-11· cited 13×
- People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-05-07· cited 10×
- v. Dax Ace AndersonColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-04-02· cited 7×
- People v. RuchColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-06-20· cited 7×
- People v. DavisColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-01-05
- People v. Timothy Mark GemelliColorado Court of Appeals· 2023-12-14
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- People v. HrapskiSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-05-19· cited 593×
- People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-03-15· cited 383×
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-05-08· cited 204×
- Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-05-09· cited 194×
- Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 191×
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-09-25· cited 115×
- Lewis Donald Fritz v. James SpaldingNinth Circuit· 1982-07-27· cited 92×
- People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-09· cited 84×
- People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-01-21· cited 84×
- United States v. Marvin Neal SmithNinth Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 73×
- Russell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-12-15· cited 70×
- People v. FishSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-03-14· cited 65×
- People v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-03-31· cited 54×
- Lacy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-06-05· cited 44×
- Hamiel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 42×
- People v. PrattSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-07-05· cited 37×
- People v. SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-11-09· cited 36×
- People v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-04-26· cited 31×
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-12-29· cited 23×
Other cases named People v. Mogul
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.