United States v. Marvin Neal Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he [district] court’s findings, including the ultimate finding of intent [to delay], were not clearly erroneous”
• declining to clarify the correct standard of review because the outcome would be the same under any standard
• declining to clarify the correct standard of review because the outcome would be the same under any standard
• no error when court noted that the defendant lacked legal experience, but “clearly based its decision on timeliness”
• request is timely if made prior to jury selection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).