· 4/24/2003
People v. Milligan
Citations
- 77 P.3d 771
- 2003 WL 204721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[B]ecause the trial court addressed defendant’s statements and the Miranda issue at the suppression hearing, we conclude the issue was properly preserved for appeal.”
- “[B]ecause the trial court addressed defendant’s statements and the Miranda issue at the suppression hearing, we conclude the issue was properly preserved for appeal.”
- An officer’s impoundment decision was upheld where “a vehicle was driven illegally and the driver has been arrested” and “the practice is to impound the vehicle, unless a passenger has a valid driver’s license and is then allowed to drive the car away.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothenberg, Taubman, Webb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.