Skip to main content
· 4/24/2003

People v. Milligan

Citations

  • 77 P.3d 771
  • 2003 WL 204721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[B]ecause the trial court addressed defendant’s statements and the Miranda issue at the suppression hearing, we conclude the issue was properly preserved for appeal.”
  • “[B]ecause the trial court addressed defendant’s statements and the Miranda issue at the suppression hearing, we conclude the issue was properly preserved for appeal.”
  • An officer’s impoundment decision was upheld where “a vehicle was driven illegally and the driver has been arrested” and “the practice is to impound the vehicle, unless a passenger has a valid driver’s license and is then allowed to drive the car away.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Taubman, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.