Skip to main content

People v. Milligan

Citations

  • 77 P.3d 771
  • 2003 WL 204721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[B]ecause the trial court addressed defendant’s statements and the Miranda issue at the suppression hearing, we conclude the issue was properly preserved for appeal.”
  • “[B]ecause the trial court addressed defendant’s statements and the Miranda issue at the suppression hearing, we conclude the issue was properly preserved for appeal.”
  • An officer’s impoundment decision was upheld where “a vehicle was driven illegally and the driver has been arrested” and “the practice is to impound the vehicle, unless a passenger has a valid driver’s license and is then allowed to drive the car away.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Taubman, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases named People v. Milligan

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.