Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/5/1984

People v. Miller

Citations

464 N.E.2d 1197
124 Ill. App. 3d 620
80 Ill. Dec. 214
1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 1873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[i]t is well established in Illinois that a defendant may not repeatedly relitigate a pretrial motion to suppress” unless there is additional evidence or peculiar circumstances warranting reconsideration, but merely discovering a new argument is not sufficient.
barring defendant from relitigating a pretrial motion to suppress unless there is additional evidence or peculiar circumstances warranting reconsideration not merely discovering a new argument
“[I]t is not sufficient that the defense has discovered a new argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.