Colorado Court of Appeals· 12/31/1992
People v. Loomis
Citations
- 857 P.2d 478
- 17 Brief Times Rptr. 16
- 1992 Colo. App. LEXIS 463
- 1992 WL 387069
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- under the \easily accessible and readily available\ test, it is not necessary to analyze a defendant's willingness or present ability to use the firearm
- a defendant who steals a weapon during the course of a burglary may be found to have been armed if he or she had immediate access to the weapon during the offense
- even if a burglar did not intend to use the weapon, its use might follow if he or she is confronted by the police, the property owner, or a bystander; thus, the potential for danger may be escalated when the burglar becomes armed with a deadly weapon
- even if a burglar did not intend to use the weapon, its use might follow if he or she is confronted by the police, the property owner, or a bystander; thus, the potential for danger may be escalated when the burglar becomes armed with a deadly weapon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sternberg, Metzger, Plank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 83×
- People v. SimpsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-02-26· cited 46×
- People v. LucasColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-08-06· cited 38×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-05-20· cited 25×
- State v. RayMontana Supreme Court· 2003-06-23· cited 18×
- People v. AtencioColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-06-30· cited 18×
- People v. GraceyColorado Court of Appeals· 1996-11-07· cited 15×
- People v. ColeColorado Court of Appeals· 1996-11-12· cited 12×
- People v. YoungColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-11-03· cited 11×
- People v. AdamsColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-06-17· cited 8×
- State v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-09-21· cited 8×
- People v. MontezColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 4×
- State v. SalesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-06-26· cited 3×
- State of Indiana v. Amber E. McHenryIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-04-12· cited 3×
- People v. FirmColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 3×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. DillonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-12-20· cited 98×
- People v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-06-25· cited 65×
- People v. NunezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-09· cited 59×
- People v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-09-02· cited 53×
- Buchannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-05-12· cited 34×
- Flower v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-02-07· cited 33×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-29· cited 31×
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-11-18· cited 25×
- State v. MerrittNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-04-23· cited 24×
- State v. BeffordArizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-13· cited 23×
- Rocha v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-13· cited 22×
- Wesolic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-07-17· cited 20×
- Meadows v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1977-05-13· cited 18×
- People v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-02-27· cited 16×
- State v. MerrittSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-06-27· cited 16×
- State v. SpeeceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-27· cited 14×
- People v. VelaColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-11-21· cited 13×
- Britt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 13×
- People v. RiveraColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-05-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.