People v. Leichty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that officer's field test \for amphetamines\ \cannot be characterized as a search subject to the Fourth Amendment\
• noting that officer’s field test “for amphetamines” “cannot be characterized as a search subject to the Fourth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Madrid
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-07-10· cited 15×
• People v. Warren
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-04-12· cited 4×
• People v. Coston
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-06-27· cited 2×
• Thorp v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2018-05-24

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Carroll v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
• Brinegar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
• United States v. Place
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
• United States v. Jacobsen
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
• Texas v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
• Walter v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 793×
• United States v. Charles Davis AKA Marcus Anderson
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-06-29· cited 305×
• United States v. Michael Allen Vasey
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-12-15· cited 201×
• United States v. Thomas J. Licata
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-06-10· cited 99×
• Rodriguez v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-04-05· cited 28×
• United States v. Bruce A. Mulder
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-01-26· cited 19×
• United States v. Villard
  D. New Jersey· 1988-02-11· cited 10×