People v. Lawrence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When certain evidence is omitted from an earlier statement, but later found to be relevant and testified to at trial, this does not constitute an inconsistency for the purposes of [section 115-10.1].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Morales
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-06· cited 46×
• People v. Govea
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-09-16· cited 30×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Collins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
• People v. Slim
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 502×
• People v. Redd
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-03-22· cited 223×
• People v. Schott
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-31· cited 217×
• People v. Cruz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-12-07· cited 19×
• People v. Ramey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-07-21· cited 9×
• United States v. Raymond Stanley Griffin
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-02-23· cited 5×