Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/31/1999

People v. Latto

Citations

  • 710 N.E.2d 72
  • 304 Ill. App. 3d 791
  • 237 Ill. Dec. 649
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motion arguing that a sentence was “excessive” was specific enough to preserve the defendant’s claim that his sentence was a punishment for exercising his right to trial
  • sentence will be set aside where it is evident from the record that the court imposed the sentence, at least in part, because the defendant availed himself of his right to a trial instead of pleading guilty
  • sentence will be set aside where it is evident from the record that the court imposed the sentence, at least in part, because the defendant availed himself of his right to a trial instead of pleading guilty
  • finding no error in the admission of retrograde extrapolation evidence
  • finding no error in the admission of retrograde extrapolation evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman, Hourihane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Latto

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.