Supreme Court of Colorado· 1/14/2013
People v. LaRosa
Citations
- 293 P.3d 567
- 2013 CO 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abandoning the corpus delicti rule in favor of the trustworthiness standard
- abandoning corpus delicti rule after concluding that it was “too rigid in its approach, too narrow in its application, and too capable of working injustice in cases where, as here, evidence of the corpus delicti is not only non-existent but impossible to uncover”
- “[T]he corroboration requirement is not an elemental test.... [I]t does not require the court to review the evidence as it relates to the specific elements of the crime.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Coats, Eid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brooke E. Rojas v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2022-02-21· cited 1,361×
- People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 524×
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-05-11· cited 321×
- Carrizales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-12-11· cited 296×
- People v. BondsteelColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 209×
- State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court· 2014-03-06· cited 196×
- State of Tennessee v. Fred Chad Clark, IITennessee Supreme Court· 2014-11-10· cited 183×
- State v. DernSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-25· cited 118×
- McShane v. Stirling Ranch Property Owners Association, IncSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-05-01· cited 108×
- People v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-05-26· cited 77×
- Miller, Christopher AdrianCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-15· cited 57×
- People v. WiseColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-07-03· cited 21×
- 20SC399 - Rojas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2022-02-22· cited 16×
- People v. FosterColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-06-06· cited 15×
- Love v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado· 2018-03-19· cited 14×
- State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-05-02· cited 8×
- State v. PlastowSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-12-23· cited 7×
- People v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-04-24· cited 7×
- State v. KukertNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-10-28· cited 7×
- Terrill Kim Morris v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-01-23· cited 6×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 3,788×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 719×
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 2001-05-14· cited 616×
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado· 1973-10-29· cited 521×
- Clark v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2010-06-07· cited 409×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-01-29· cited 360×
- United States v. CalderonSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 273×
- Oram v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2011-05-16· cited 263×
- United States v. Raul Lopez-AlvarezNinth Circuit· 1992-07-08· cited 249×
- People v. HumphreySupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-04-17· cited 203×
- Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 200×
- United States v. HatterSupreme Court· 2001-05-21· cited 190×
- People v. RobsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-09-25· cited 187×
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-06-01· cited 182×
- People v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-06-27· cited 138×
Other cases named People v. LaRosa
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.