Michigan Court of Appeals· 8/23/2002

People v. Lange

Citations

650 N.W.2d 691
251 Mich. App. 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a “glass mug” could constitute a weapon for purposes of OV 1
stating that 5 points is proper under OV 1 where a defendant “merely us[es] an object to imply the presence of a weapon”
stating that 5 points is proper under OV 1 where a defendant “merely us[es] an object to imply the presence of a weapon”
explaining that a weapon can be something dangerous by design or only when “turned to such purpose”
describing as a weapon “any instrument or device used for attack or defense in a fight or in combat” and “anything used against an opponent, adversary, or victim”
noting the dictionary definition of “weapon” as “any instrument or device used for attack or defense in a fight or in combat” and “anything used against an opponent, adversary or victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin, Smolensk, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Lange

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.