People v. Lain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defense counsel’s law firm’s representation of the alleged victim “has been recognized to be a per se conflict of interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Cukojevic
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-29· cited 31×
• People v. Fountain
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-03-06· cited 23×
• People v. Sprouse
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-23· cited 15×
• People v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-01· cited 10×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The People v. Stoval
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-05-29· cited 250×
• People v. Coslet
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 136×
• The People v. Cox
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1961-09-22· cited 101×
• People v. Guynn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-21· cited 70×
• The People v. Whitehead
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-10-28· cited 51×
• The PEOPLE v. Long
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-01-19· cited 44×
• The People v. Prohaska
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1956-05-23· cited 43×
• People v. Heidelberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-13· cited 35×
• The PEOPLE v. Friedrich
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1960-09-29· cited 19×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-05-11· cited 11×
• People v. Robinson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-03· cited 4×