· 6/1/1977
People v. Coslet
Citations
- 364 N.E.2d 67
- 67 Ill. 2d 127
- 7 Ill. Dec. 80
- 1977 Ill. LEXIS 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the right to counsel “entitles the person represented to the undivided loyalty of counsel”
- finding per se conflict where attorney represented both the defendant in her trial for voluntary manslaughter of her husband and the administrator of the deceased husband’s estate
- finding a Stoval conflict where counsel simultaneously represented both the defendant in her trial for voluntary manslaughter of her husband and the administrator of the husband’s estate; the conflict raised the possibility that the estate would be enriched if the defendant was convicted
- conflict resulted in reversal even though attorney’s performance not before the court
- “allegations and proof of prejudice are unnecessary in cases where a defense counsel, without the knowledgeable assent of the defendant, might be restrained in fully representing the defendant’s interests due to his or her commitments to others”
- defense counsel simultaneously represented administrator of victim’s estate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.