Skip to main content
· 6/1/1977

People v. Coslet

Citations

  • 364 N.E.2d 67
  • 67 Ill. 2d 127
  • 7 Ill. Dec. 80
  • 1977 Ill. LEXIS 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the right to counsel “entitles the person represented to the undivided loyalty of counsel”
  • finding per se conflict where attorney represented both the defendant in her trial for voluntary manslaughter of her husband and the administrator of the deceased husband’s estate
  • finding a Stoval conflict where counsel simultaneously represented both the defendant in her trial for voluntary manslaughter of her husband and the administrator of the husband’s estate; the conflict raised the possibility that the estate would be enriched if the defendant was convicted
  • conflict resulted in reversal even though attorney’s performance not before the court
  • “allegations and proof of prejudice are unnecessary in cases where a defense counsel, without the knowledgeable assent of the defendant, might be restrained in fully representing the defendant’s interests due to his or her commitments to others”
  • defense counsel simultaneously represented administrator of victim’s estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.