People v. Kluxdal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding for new trial where trial court's repeated reference to incorrect standard of \clear and convincing evidence\ rebutted the presumption that trial court applied proper burden of proof in assessing insanity defense
• reversing and remanding for new trial where trial court’s repeated reference to incorrect standard of “clear and convincing evidence” rebutted the presumption that trial court applied proper burden of proof in assessing insanity defense
• post-offense conduct which lays groundwork for insanity defense evidence of sanity
• court applied improper burden of proof to insanity defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).