People v. Kinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that medical doctors are often essential to the 17 No. 1-22-0493 defense of indigent criminal defendants
• finding that the judiciary possesses a limited power to exceed the $250 limit set forth in section 113-3 and that experts “must usually be offered a substantial fee as compensation for time spent in making necessary findings and diagnoses and appearing to testify”
• expert witness’ fee recoverable only if expert’s testimony necessary to prove crucial issue in case
• because express contract for compensation existed between client and attorney, quantum meruit relief was not available
• because express contract for compensation existed between client and attorney, quantum meruit relief was not available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lawson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-01· cited 113×
• Cripe v. Leiter
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 72×
• Coughlin v. SeRine
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-03-31· cited 27×
• In Re Marriage of Angiuli
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-06-28· cited 27×
• People v. Evans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-03-24· cited 20×
• People v. Hightower
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-07-26· cited 18×
• Schroeder v. Sullivan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-08-24· cited 17×
• People v. Russell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-10-02· cited 12×
• In Re ES
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-30· cited 11×
• People v. T.W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-30· cited 10×
• State v. Emanuel
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-10-21· cited 5×
• Application of Jobe
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-11-19· cited 3×
• People v. Vallo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-06-14· cited 2×
• People v. Coleman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-30· cited 1×
• People v. Camden
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-11-21
• People v. Murbarger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2026-04-13

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Finley v. Finley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-05-30· cited 164×
• The People v. Watson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-12-01· cited 106×
• People Ex Rel. Conn v. Randolph
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-08-16· cited 97×
• The PEOPLE v. Glover
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 95×
• Dill v. Widman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1952-11-20· cited 90×
• People v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-11-20· cited 42×
• Neville v. Davinroy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-09-02· cited 38×
• Laff v. Chapman Performance Products, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-31· cited 28×
• In Re Kutner
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-19· cited 26×
• People v. Sanders
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1974-09-27· cited 14×
• In RE PETITION FOR FEES IN: PEOPLE v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-02-24· cited 12×
• People v. Vines
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-12-02· cited 9×
• Barnes v. Barnes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1922-04-18· cited 4×
• People v. Kinion
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-26· cited 2×

Other cases named People v. Kinion

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Kinion
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-05· cited 18×
• People v. Kinion
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-26· cited 2×