Skip to main content
· 9/23/1983

People v. Kinion

Citations

  • 454 N.E.2d 625
  • 97 Ill. 2d 322
  • 73 Ill. Dec. 528
  • 1983 Ill. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that medical doctors are often essential to the 17 No. 1-22-0493 defense of indigent criminal defendants
  • finding that the judiciary possesses a limited power to exceed the $250 limit set forth in section 113-3 and that experts “must usually be offered a substantial fee as compensation for time spent in making necessary findings and diagnoses and appearing to testify”
  • expert witness’ fee recoverable only if expert’s testimony necessary to prove crucial issue in case
  • because express contract for compensation existed between client and attorney, quantum meruit relief was not available
  • because express contract for compensation existed between client and attorney, quantum meruit relief was not available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.