Appellate Court of Illinois· 7/26/1988
People v. Hightower
Citations
- 526 N.E.2d 1129
- 172 Ill. App. 3d 678
- 122 Ill. Dec. 590
- 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 1120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that section 3—2(b) placing burden of proving the affirmative defense of insanity on a defendant is constitutional
- “The Illinois Courts and the Illinois Legislature ha[ve] made a distinction between mens rea and sanity. *** A defendant can perform an intended act whether or not he recognizes the moral or social implications of the act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calvo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 154×
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-04· cited 123×
- People v. McDarrahAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-10-06· cited 28×
- People v. SeamanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-08-30· cited 22×
- People v. ValdezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2022-06-29· cited 21×
- People v. ClayAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-09-30· cited 17×
- People v. BouchardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-02-28· cited 15×
- People v. BradleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-10-11· cited 12×
- People v. HightowerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-01· cited 10×
- People v. HightowerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-20· cited 8×
- Emergency Treatment, S.C. v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-30· cited 5×
- People v. UriosteAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-10-11· cited 4×
- Taylor v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2024-01-05· cited 4×
- People v. EngramAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-01-22· cited 3×
- Yaodi Hu v. Village of MidlothianN.D. Illinois· 2009-05-14
- People v. Clay Opinion corrected on 12/06/05 Opinion corrected on 12/16/05Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-09-30
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-12-16· cited 594×
- The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 220×
- People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-06-29· cited 214×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 202×
- State v. NealySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-04-19· cited 200×
- United States v. Donald Kenneth CurrensThird Circuit· 1961-05-01· cited 193×
- State v. CrenshawWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-17· cited 163×
- Rivera v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1976-10-12· cited 155×
- United States v. Lavance Greene, United States of America v. Randolph GreeneD.C. Circuit· 1974-02-01· cited 124×
- People v. District Court for County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1968-03-18· cited 114×
- State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-09-18· cited 98×
- People v. GrantIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 91×
- The PEOPLE v. BenderIllinois Supreme Court· 1960-09-29· cited 87×
- Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-12-17· cited 78×
- Hopps v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1863-04-15· cited 68×
- State v. KorellMontana Supreme Court· 1984-11-16· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.