Skip to main content

People v. Kagan

Citations

  • 669 N.E.2d 1239
  • 283 Ill. App. 3d 212
  • 218 Ill. Dec. 713
  • 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if section 5 — 8—4(a) applies the court may not impose consecutive sentences pursuant to section 5 — 8—4(b)
  • holding that if section 5--8--4(a) applies the court may not impose consecutive sentences pursuant to section 5--8--4(b)
  • holding the record must support a finding of independent criminal motivation
  • holding the record must support a finding of independent criminal motivation
  • using both \independent criminal motivation” language and \overarching criminal objective” language
  • using both \independent criminal motivation\ language and \overarching criminal objective\ language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Kagan

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.