People v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to properly define consent in a case involving criminal sexual conduct
• failure to properly define consent in a case involving criminal sexual conduct
• “The court’s instruction requiring the jury to find that penetration was accomplished by force or coercion implicitly required the jury to find that the complainant did not consent to sexual intercourse before it could find defendant guilty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Matuszak
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2004-09-29· cited 698×
• People v. Grant
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-07-12· cited 296×
• In Re Petition for Writ of Prohibition
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-08· cited 74×
• People v. Strong
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-06-04· cited 36×
• People v. Hale
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-05-06· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Atkins
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-07-08· cited 89×
• People v. Cherry
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1974-12-24· cited 69×
• People v. Howe
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1974-09-06· cited 68×
• People v. Sherman Hall
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-08-22· cited 56×
• People v. Worden
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-08-20· cited 46×
• People v. Jansson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-06-08· cited 44×
• People v. Castillo
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-03-10· cited 31×
• People v. Hollis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-03-18· cited 22×
• People v. Joseph
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-03-04· cited 17×
• People v. Ferguson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-12-05· cited 12×
• People v. Solomon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-02-24· cited 12×
• People v. Paquette
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-06· cited 9×
• People v. Nichols
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-05-28· cited 4×