People v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an amendment that altered the required mens rea was one of substance because it resulted in a “different and more serious offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Manyik
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-03-24· cited 502×
• People v. Weinreich
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-10-18· cited 236×
• Cervantes v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-03-17· cited 42×
• People v. Brown
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1983-09-22· cited 6×
• v. Palmer
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-03-22· cited 5×
• People v. Cervantes
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-01-23· cited 4×
• People v. Sherrod
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-07-26· cited 4×
• People v. Hodge
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1981-03-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Naranjo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-05-19· cited 46×
• People v. Becker
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-02-03· cited 29×
• Bustamante v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1957-11-04· cited 29×
• People v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-01-06· cited 22×
• People v. Bourg
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-07-26· cited 10×
• People v. Gimmy
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1980-12-08· cited 7×
• People v. Shortt
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-12-06· cited 6×