California Court of Appeal· 6/19/1995
People v. Joehnk
Citations
- 35 Cal. App. 4th 1488
- 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 6
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 8004
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4697
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, upon a review of the expert testimony introduced at trial as well as a review of the case law of California and other jurisdictions, that HGN testing is generally accepted in the scientific community as a useful tool when combined with other tests and observations
- HGN test is generally accepted as a useful tool “when combined with other tests and observations in reaching an opinion whether a defendant was intoxicated”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-02-15· cited 266×
- People v. McKownIllinois Supreme Court· 2010-02-19· cited 138×
- People v. McKownIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 95×
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Carlos R.California Court of Appeal· 2012-03-27· cited 76×
- United States v. HornD. Maryland· 2002-01-31· cited 53×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 39×
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-04-03· cited 38×
- State v. DahoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-20· cited 28×
- State v. HullingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-07-10· cited 15×
- People v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-10-23· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1996-11-22· cited 6×
- People v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-10-23
- Inquiry Concerning Van VoorhisState of California Commission On Judicial Performance· 2003-02-27
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 668×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-12-05· cited 411×
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 407×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- People v. DiazCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-08-31· cited 254×
- People v. LeahyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 195×
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 185×
- State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 181×
- People v. SeniorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-03-24· cited 127×
- State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-12-22· cited 112×
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa· 1990-01-24· cited 100×
- State v. WitteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 74×
- City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 60×
- State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court· 1988-10-07· cited 59×
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court· 1990-10-11· cited 56×
- People v. BueningAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-26· cited 55×
- State v. MerrittConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-07-29· cited 52×
- State v. ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-05-09· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.