Skip to main content
· 6/19/1995

People v. Joehnk

Citations

  • 35 Cal. App. 4th 1488
  • 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 6
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 8004
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4697
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, upon a review of the expert testimony introduced at trial as well as a review of the case law of California and other jurisdictions, that HGN testing is generally accepted in the scientific community as a useful tool when combined with other tests and observations
  • HGN test is generally accepted as a useful tool “when combined with other tests and observations in reaching an opinion whether a defendant was intoxicated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.