People v. Jerry M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing circumstances relevant to proving intent to satisfy sexual desires, including the age and sexual maturity of the accused minor and whether the minor has reached puberty
• \[The younger the minor the less likely his acts are with the specific intent of sexual arousal.\
• “[T]he younger the minor the less likely his acts are with the specific intent of sexual arousal.”
• court held there was no evidence an 11-year-old boy touched the victim's vagina for the purpose of sexual arousal, noting \the younger the minor the less likely his acts are with the specific intent of sexual arousal\
• court held there was no evidence an 11-year-old boy touched the victim's vagina for the purpose of sexual arousal, noting \the younger the minor the less likely his acts are with the specific intent of sexual arousal\
• court held there was no evidence an 11-year-old boy touched the victim’s vagina for the purpose of sexual arousal, noting “the younger the minor the less likely his acts are with the specific intent of sexual arousal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).