People v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not understand why the prosecutor would propose a modified instruction that affirmatively misstated the law. We do not understand why defense counsel did not object. We do not understand why the trial court gave an instruction that was contrary to our decision in Maggette.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. McNeal
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-11-24· cited 30×
• People v. Milka
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-17· cited 29×
• People v. Causey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-27· cited 26×
• People v. Lloyd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-11-16· cited 6×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-30· cited 5×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Simms
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 336×
• People v. Maggette
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-03-29· cited 332×
• People v. Williams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 235×
• People v. Jones
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 225×
• People v. Terrell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 209×
• People v. Lawler
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-02-22· cited 158×
• People v. Porter
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 88×
• People v. Shields
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 77×
• People v. Gutirrez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-08-03· cited 47×
• People v. Laugharn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-07-22· cited 35×
• People v. Maggette
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-01-26· cited 20×
• People v. Mattingly
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-03-23· cited 11×