People v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee could not be guilty of violating commercial bribery statute because employer knew of payment and declined to stop it; employer's allowance reflected fact that payment could not have been contrary to employer's interest
• holding that an employee could not be guilty of violating commercial bribery statute because employer knew of payment and declined to stop it; employer's allowance reflected fact that payment could not have been contrary to employer's interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Jon Geibel, Chad L. Conner, and Gordon K. Allen, Jr.
  Second Circuit· 2004-05-28· cited 113×
• United States v. Louis Parise, Jr.
  Third Circuit· 1998-10-28· cited 41×
• People v. Kacer
  New York Supreme Court· 1982-03-26· cited 9×
• People v. Reynolds
  New York Supreme Court· 1997-05-05· cited 7×
• Nelson v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-03-05· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• People v. Graf
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1941-01-17· cited 10×