United States v. Jon Geibel, Chad L. Conner, and Gordon K. Allen, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants were not prejudiced by the introduction of evidence related to a larger conspiracy where there was “overwhelming” evidence of involvement in a smaller conspiracy
• holding that defendants were not prejudiced by the introduction of evidence related to a larger conspiracy where there was “overwhelming” evidence of involvement in a smaller conspiracy
• explaining that when two participants do not mutually benefit from the other’s participation, a finding of a single conspiracy is less likely
• holding venue improper where actions taken in the Southern District of New York were “anterior and remote to” the criminal conduct
• rejecting challenge to SDNY venue on counts 6 involving purchases of options executed on the American Stock Exchange located and 7 headquartered in the SDNY
• Sixth Amendment gives criminal defendant right to be tried in district where crime committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).