Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/27/1978

People v. Jackson

Citations

376 N.E.2d 685
59 Ill. App. 3d 1004
17 Ill. Dec. 539
1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 2596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the defendant’s “conduct of the defense demonstrated his intricate knowledge of court proceedings and his familiarity with court records”
stating that the defendant’s “conduct of the defense demonstrated his intricate knowledge of court proceedings and his familiarity with court records”
finding that although the court did not expressly state that if indigent, the defendant had a right to appointed counsel, the defendant nevertheless understood his right in part because he had been appointed a public defender prior to trial
substantial compliance was found, in part, because of “defendant’s lengthy record and his familiarity with criminal law and procedure”
“We conclude defendant understood this right to counsel because he had in fact been represented by the public defender *** without charge, until he discharged him”
“We conclude defendant understood this right to counsel because he had in fact been represented by the public defender of Cook County without charge, until he discharged him ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dieringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.